upstream keepalive: call for testing

Brian Pane brianp at brianp.net
Thu Jul 28 04:12:09 UTC 2011


On Wednesday, July 27, 2011, Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> wrote:

> Keepalive connections are mostly beneficial if response costs are
> comparable with connection establishment costs (i.e. over
> high-latency links or with really fast backends).

There's an additional benefit for high-traffic reverse proxy installations
(for example, sites that use nginx as a load balancer) : with keepalive
connections, there's less risk of running out of ephemeral port numbers - or
less need to decrease the TIME_WAIT interval to free up ephemeral port
numbers faster.

-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/attachments/20110727/bb9e6b59/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx-devel mailing list