onefriedrice at brokenzipper.com
Fri Aug 15 09:57:13 MSD 2008
Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:24:45PM +0800, walt wrote:
>> I am not very sure,the image is 27.88KB itself.
> Then I do not understand what 457 and 699 mean.
>> 2008/8/15 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>
>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0800, walt wrote:
>>>> I use httpwatch to test a same image in apache and nginx.The result is
>>>> apache 457
>>>> nginx 699
>>>> I think that is where the question arises.
>>> What is this size ? Size of the image or size of image + HTTP header size ?
>>> What the size of the image itself ?
>>> Igor Sysoev
Maybe I don't understand this whole discussion, but why doesn't someone
just tcpdump both transactions and _see_ what the difference is? I
can't imagine a system admin would take a week to hypothesize about
config files when they could just dump the transactions to determine
what is going on.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the nginx