On Jul 21, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote: > I know this has been talked about before, but never satisfactorily > (and just to preempt - "or" isnt "and"). Is there any reason for not > enabling "and"s in "if" conditions? Are there any plans to do so? Wait, does this mean 'or' works in if conditions?