[OT] CMS suggestions?
hone at codingstore.com
Thu Aug 13 17:23:40 MSD 2009
Haihoa, maybe look into memcached if you have a lot of concurrent
connects which are registered users. Batcache is good.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Haihoa<haihoa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Low memory footprint yes but wordpress is very cpu intensive. My quad core
> server has load around 3-4 at peak with 150 established connections. The
> stack is centos 64 + nginx + php-fpm + apc + wordpress + wp-supercache
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, miradev <nginx-forum at nginx.us> wrote:
>> Nuno Magalhães Wrote:
>> linux + nginx + fcgi + wordpress + mysql = fast, cheap, low memory
>> footprint (small scale) websites, provision thereof
>> Posted at Nginx Forum:
More information about the nginx