Nginx securiy problem
mike503 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 08:55:13 MSK 2009
it's just easier to maintain status quo. more people at my work are
used to apache already. :)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Igor Sysoev <igor at sysoev.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:01:21PM -0800, Michael Shadle wrote:
>> Yah. I tried thttpd but it crashed on me randomly. Apache is stable.
>> Works good enough. And the machines I use it on have more than enough
> mini_httpd is much more simpler than thttpd: it's just a simple server
> forking for every request, i.e., exactly what is required for CGI.
>> It'd be nice if nginx could do cgi :p I have to support mailman and
>> bugzilla. Both seem archaic. One reason I am actually starting a php
>> mailman replacement since there are literally only 3-4 mail list
>> managers out there. None are simple to use or configure either. If
>> anyone wants to help contribute to this effort... Email me off list.
>> I'm hiring a coder to do it for me. Then I will open source it like
>> wordpress and such.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Igor Sysoev <igor at sysoev.ru> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:37:17PM -0800, Michael Shadle wrote:
>> >> Using apache for anything if you don't need to if nginx will do it
>> >> for
>> >> you is a waste of resources and complicates your setup.
>> >> I only use apache for mod_dav_svn, and cgi. Of which I am trying to
>> >> minimize that impact by getting mailman ported to php :)
>> > CGI at http://nginx.org/mailman/ is run by mini_httpd.
> Igor Sysoev
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
More information about the nginx