Cache questions

[Igor Sysoev]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:26:22AM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote:

> 
> 
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:09:34PM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> >
> >  
> >>It is now logging "HIT" or "MISS" for each request in that location block.
> >>
> >>It is safe to assume that with fastcgi_cache_min_uses set at 2 that for 
> >>every first miss shared memory is allocated, that the file is written to 
> >>the cache on the second miss, and that each logged "hit" is an actual 
> >>serve from the cache (third and subsequent requests for the file)?
> >>    
> >
> >Yes. Currently, there are "MISS", "EXPIRED", "STALE", "UPDATING", and "HIT"
> >states. If you will think out a good name for state when miss is just 
> >counted,
> >but not cached, I will make this state.
> >
> >
> >  
> "MISS-NOT_CACHED"  fairly well tells the story, if it's not too long. 
> Otherwise  "MISS-NC".
> 
> Or perhaps "MISS-COUNTING".

May be just "COUNTING" ?


-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/