mogilefs module 1.0.2

Michael Shadle mike503 at
Sun Jul 26 01:44:11 MSD 2009

Just for discussion sake why is that? I actually have the same  
instance of nginx with two separate http{} blocks. One for mogstored  
and one for normal web serving. It might even be possible to have it  
under the same http block. I never looked into it that much.

I guess explaining the pros and cons of doing it that way vs. Using  
the module would be good info to know.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen at 
 > wrote:

> Yes, but making a mogstored node out of it is a bad idea.
> Michael Shadle wrote:
>> So this means this module now handles the DAV requests as well, so it
>> can be a mogstored node?
>> nginx technically already supported that :) However this could be  
>> more
>> efficient, etc. I'm wondering if I am understanding this properly.
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Valery
>> Kholodkov<valery+nginxen at> wrote:
>>> Changes in version 1.0.2 (July 25 2009):
>>> * Added feature: directive mogilefs_methods and support for PUT  
>>> and DELETE
>>> methods
>>> * Added feature: dynamic evaluation of tracker name
>>> * Added feature: ability to pass noverify parameter to tracker
>>> The first 2 features were commissioned by GG Network SA ( 
>>> ).
>>> These features allow write access to MogileFS using nginx, as well  
>>> as
>>> locating of tracker dynamically. The Gadu-Gadu developers were  
>>> very kind to
>>> test these features. Hopefully there are no major issues.
>>> The noverify parameter instructs MogileFS tracker to avoid  
>>> querying the
>>> database for location of files if possible and use cached results,  
>>> thus
>>> eliminating some of the database server load.
>>> The details on the following page:
>>> Feel free to contact me if you have problems with this!
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Valery Kholodkov

More information about the nginx mailing list