al-nginx at none.at
Fri Jun 20 12:07:43 UTC 2014
Dear B. R.
> Am 20-06-2014 07:10, schrieb B.R.:
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Aleksandar Lazic <al-nginx at none.at>
>>> Am 18-06-2014 20:46, schrieb Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu:
>>> Oh god 1350$
>> Per year.
>> It's cheap compared to some other commercial Servers, from my point of
> ... and it is expensive compared to the open-source Apache.
> nginx as FOSS is great.
> nginx Plus is worth as much as other commercial/closed-source
On this point we have different opinions.
> The 'sticky' property is out of scope of this ML since not part of the
> FOSS nginx.
I haven't seen in the past such a separation, but it's ok for me , if
the ML-Moderators want this.
> End of discussion.
It's up to you and every other ML participant to answer to a post on the
ML or not.
Command not acknowledge.
Well, I'm with you that the price discussion is here wrong.
> The docs are already polluted with mentions of the commercial product
> since, surprisingly,
> nginx Plus docs have not been separated from nginx FOSS ones.
I like to know which features are available on a SW even in the
That's my point of view, of course yours could be another one.
> On a personal stance, I would like not to see this ML polluted with
> discussions on nginx Plus.
But may be other?
In the past I haven't seen to much such discussions on this ML.
> B. R.
More information about the nginx