B.R. reallfqq-nginx at
Fri Jun 3 10:42:52 UTC 2016

xD Maxim.

I would have put 'hopefully' along with 'surprisingly' though... just to
convince myself such dumbness is marginal.

To lists at, nginx version can already be removed with the help
of the server_tokens
Why that is not the default brings back the eternal difficulties around
changing defaults, compatbility and stability, debate I (re)initiated
around some other 'odd' defaults.

Anyway, we are drifting away from the original subject, which is... Oh
yeah, stupidity. And next to his lawyer. (And huge font size.)
*B. R.*

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Konovalov <maxim at> wrote:

> On 6/3/16 7:33 AM, lists at wrote:
> > Perhaps in a future release of Nginx, the error pages should not
> > contain any reference to nginx. That is the only way I can figure
> > out this person came up with the idea of complaining to the list.
> > (Assuming this isn't spam to encourage use to click on that website
> > link.)
> >
> Actually, a number of such complains is still surprisingly low.
> > I think another mistake is to have the error page indicate the rev
> > of nginx. That is an easy way for someone to spot a vulnerable rev
> > of the nginx on a server.
> >
> --
> Maxim Konovalov
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the nginx mailing list