Possible memory leak?

lists at lazygranch.com lists at lazygranch.com
Sat Mar 9 01:07:12 UTC 2019


On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:42:28 -0500
"wkbrad" <nginx-forum at forum.nginx.org> wrote:

> Thanks for that info.  It's definitely harder to notice the issue on
> small servers like that.  But you are still seeing about a 50%
> increase in ram usage there by your own tests.
> 
> The smallest server I've tested this on uses about 20M during the
> first start and about 50M after a reload is completely finished.
> 
> Not so much of a problem for small servers but definitely a big
> problem for large ones.  That said the issue is still there on small
> servers like you've just seen.
> 
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,283216,283318#msg-283318
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Actually the total RAM went down after a reload for my ps_mem in the
previous email. I repeated the test just using free, which could be a
polluted test, but the RAM went down again. I also did the ps_mem test
again and total RAM was reduced.

I'm not caching in nginx, if that makes a difference.

sh-4.2# free -m
              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:           1838         276         175         104        1385        1259
Swap:             0           0           0
sh-4.2# systemctl reload nginx
sh-4.2# free -m
              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:           1838         272         180         104        1385        1263
Swap:             0           0           0

And repeated ps_mem test:
sh-4.2# ps_mem | grep nginx
  2.3 MiB +   3.5 MiB =   5.8 MiB       nginx (2)
sh-4.2# systemctl reload nginx
sh-4.2# ps_mem | grep nginx
  1.8 MiB +   3.1 MiB =   4.9 MiB       nginx (2)




More information about the nginx mailing list