[PATCH] Upstream: prioritise Cache-Control over Expires

Yugo Horie yugo-horie at jocdn.co.jp
Mon Apr 18 01:14:37 UTC 2022


We're also interested in this issue because the CDN provider like us is
concerned about the problems with the headers that determine the cache
freshness.
It is often a serious problem used in Nginx as the origin server or the
intermediate cache server that has such problems.
In those days, we also proposed a patch to resolve it.
https://mailman.nginx.org/archives/list/nginx-devel@nginx.org/thread/ZQVPGEXAAHVL23TBBNMXLP4KDGDJCVTW/

But it seems to have declined. We sincerely wish to resolve it and intend
to do anything.

Thanks,
Yugo Horie

2022年4月18日(月) 4:51 Vadim Fedorenko via nginx-devel <nginx-devel at nginx.org>:

> Hi Maxim!
>
> On 17.04.2022 02:55, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > I'm quite sceptical about attempts to fix this by introducing
> > various flags and reverting cacheable status back to 1.  This is
> > not how it should be fixed.
> >
> Yeah, the solution might be a bit complicated, but I couldn't find
> another way without breaking concept of independent header parsing.
> Could you please suggest something if you think that current approach
> is wrong? The ticket that this patch tries to fix is 6 years old and
> still has discussions going on without any solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Vadim
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list -- nginx-devel at nginx.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-devel-leave at nginx.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/attachments/20220418/fc187989/attachment.htm>


More information about the nginx-devel mailing list