Hi,
I compile a nginx for an 32bit system (ARM).
When I request a mp4 file which is larger than 2GB then it response with '416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable’.
The type of max_ranges is ngx_uint_t, I could not set it max than about 2000000000.
In this situation, I could I server the mp4 file correctly?
The ngx_size is set to 4 when I compile nginx.
So:
#ifndef NGX_MAX_SIZE_T_VALUE
#define NGX_MAX_SIZE_T_VALUE 2147483647
#endif
#ifndef NGX_SIZE_T_LEN
#define NGX_SIZE_T_LEN (sizeof("-2147483648") - 1)
#endif
#ifndef NGX_MAX_OFF_T_VALUE
#define NGX_MAX_OFF_T_VALUE 2147483647
#endif
#ifndef NGX_OFF_T_LEN
#define NGX_OFF_T_LEN (sizeof("-2147483648") - 1)
#endif
Config file:
location ~* .*\.(mp4|m3u8|m4s)$
{
max_ranges 2000000000;
include conf.d/options.conf;
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' '*';
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials' 'true';
root /mypath;
expires 6h;
}
The header of request:
Accept: */*
Accept-Encoding: identity;q=1, *;q=0
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7
Cache-Control: no-cache
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: --------
Host: 192.168.199.245
Pragma: no-cache
Range: bytes=0-
Referer: -------------
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.77 Safari/537.36 Edg/91.0.864.41
Hi All,
We’re trying to configure a client authentication on an Nginx 1.15.12 and
we noticed a “400 Bad Request - SSL Certificate Error” because a
certificate CA isn’t present into the certificates listed into
“ssl_client_certificate”. This is the configuration for the SSL
authentication.
ssl_verify_client optional;
ssl_client_certificate /usr/local/nginx/ca-test.pem;
Actually we would return a 401 error page instead a 400 error page but we
aren’t able to customize the HTTP code but only the message reported with
this configuration.
error_page 495 @error_ssl_495;
location @error_ssl_495{
return 401 'certificate invalid';
}
Is it possible to adjust also the http error code?
Thanks in advance,
Marcello
Hi,
On behalf of our marketing team I'd like to invite you, NGINX community
members, users and developers, to participate in the NGINX Annual
Community Survey.
There are 20 questions there. It will take around 10 minutes of your
valuable time to fill it:
The NGINX Annual Community Survey is open, and we would like to hear
from you. Over the past seven years, you've helped us improve our
solutions and evolve our product roadmap.
Please continue to share your experiences and ideas with us — we value
your feedback.
The anonymous survey is here:
https://survey.f5.com/v1/sites/nginx/SurveyResponse?at=1I0025DXE6KKG8JCV1KH…
Upon completion, you will receive an exclusive 90% discount code for the
NGINX swag store.
Thank you for helping shape the future of NGINX.
Regards,
NGINX team
--
Maxim Konovalov
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx(a)nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello,
We have an responseHeader with technical information sent by the upstream
server tomcat.
We want to log this information in nginx and delete the header to avoid to
be visible in the response Header to the client.
log_format formatjson escape=json '{
'"tomcat_container_id": "$TOMCAT_CONTAINER_ID" }';
Nginx.conf in http {
map $sent_http_Container_Id $TOMCAT_CONTAINER_ID {
default $sent_http_Container_Id;
}
more_clear_headers 'Container-Id';
When I do this, my log tomcat_container_id is empty.
If I comment the more_clear_header command line, I have my log fill with the
right value but the header is also sent to the client.
So I don’t understand why my $TOMCAT_CONTAINER_ID Is clear when I delete the
header and not clear if I don’t.
Thanks for your help.
Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,293336,293336#msg-293336
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list -- nginx(a)nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-leave(a)nginx.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
Hi guys
a novice here so go easy on me with this question:
having multiple 'listen' with IPs or, just one 'listen' with a hostname
which resolves to more than one IP - is it possible to tell Nginx not
fail when one of IPs is absent, does not exist?
many thanks, L.
Hello,
Is there a way to log individual websocket messages going through a nginx
server setup to proxy websocket as explained here
https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html ?
-Chinmay
I had a wordpress blog and was working on Apache. I migrated the blog to
Nginx + php-fpm. But i have a problem with this.
My blog has RSS with example.com/feed URL , and i could see the feeds with
paged like this example -> http://www.kodcu.com/feed/?paged=45.
But in Nginx, this paged RSS urls dont work with my config. /feed and
/feed/?paged=X URLs shows top 10 content.
My nginx.conf same as below. How can i handle this problem?
user root root;
worker_processes 2;
pid /var/run/nginx.pid;
events {
worker_connections 1024;
}
http {
sendfile on;
tcp_nopush on;
tcp_nodelay on;
keepalive_timeout 2;
types_hash_max_size 2048;
include /etc/nginx/mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log;
access_log off;
gzip on;
gzip_disable "msie6";
gzip_vary on;
gzip_proxied any;
gzip_comp_level 6;
gzip_buffers 16 8k;
gzip_http_version 1.1;
gzip_types text/html text/plain text/css application/json
application/x-javascript text/xml application/xml application/xml+rss
text/javascript;
##
# Virtual Host Configs
##
index index.php index.html index.htm;
## See here: http://wiki.nginx.org/WordPress
server {
server_name example.comwww.example.com;
root /var/www/example.com;
location = /favicon.ico {
log_not_found off;
access_log off;
}
location = /robots.txt {
allow all;
log_not_found off;
access_log off;
}
location / {
# This is cool because no php is touched for static content
try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?$args;
}
location ~ \.php$ {
fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
fastcgi_index index.php;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME
$document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
include fastcgi_params;
}
location ~* \.(js|css|png|jpg|jpeg|gif|ico)$ {
expires max;
log_not_found off;
}
}
}
Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,238692,238692#msg-238692
Hi Everyone,
I compile nginx from source. When I use nchan-1.2.12 everything compiles
clean.
However I tried to upgrade to nchan-1.2.15 and I get a compilation error.
Google told me the same error was reported back in February.
My C skills are a forgotten week's course taken in the early 1990s, and
never used, so I don't have the skills to sort it out.
Could it be the version of gcc OR is it conflicting with openssl3.0.3,
pcre-8.45, or zlib-1.2.12?
Thanks for ideas. I would like to use the latest nchan.
Is it possible to use a pre-compiled version, and link dynamically?
O/S Ubunutu 20.04 and Ubuntu 22.04
Regards
Ian
--
Ian Hobson
Tel (+66) 626 544 695
I run a fleet of small- to medium-scale web apps on PHP, and I'm comfortable
compiling Nginx + PHP to to optimise for my needs. Until now, I've used
PHP-FPM exclusively. I have read about performance improvements with Nginx
Unit as far as PHP is concerned. This interests me, and I have time
available to learn.
My question - for anyone who's gone from PHP-FPM to Unit…was it worth it?
What advice would you give?
Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,294258,294258#msg-294258
Hi,
I am writing my own filter module based on the gzip filter module. My filter
module would first insert a long text (200 to 1024 KB based on the
situation) at the beginning of the original response and then do some other
manipulations to the original response. The pre-configured number of buffers
that can be allocated per request (like the gzip_buffers directive in gzip
filter module) will reduce the risk of OOM.
Here is the example code:
ngx_int_t rc;
ngx_chain_t *ch = NULL;
size_t len = 64 * 4096;
ngx_buf_t *b = ngx_create_temp_buf(r->pool, len);
if (b == NULL) {
return NGX_ERROR;
}
b->recycled = 1;
b->tag = (ngx_buf_tag_t) &ngx_http_my_filter_module;
// operation to copy 64 kb data to the ngx_buf_t b;
b->last = b->pos + len;
ch = ngx_alloc_chain_link(r->pool);
if (ch == NULL) {
goto failed;
}
ch->buf = b;
ch->next = NULL;
rc = ngx_http_next_body_filter(r, ch); // rc got NGX_OK
if (rc != NGX_OK && rc != NGX_AGAIN) {
goto failed;
}
ngx_chain_update_chains(r->pool, &ctx->free, &ctx->busy, &ch,
(ngx_buf_tag_t) &ngx_http_my_filter_module);
ngx_chain_t *cl = ch;
while (cl) {
ngx_log_error(NGX_LOG_ERR, r->connection->log, 0, "buf sz: %z",
ngx_buf_size(cl->buf)); // output: buf sz: 65536
cl = cl->next;
}
// reuse the buffer b if possible
Explanation:
I created a buffer b with 64k, then I copied 64k data, then I called
ngx_http_next_body_filter to send the first 64k data to the client, then I
want to reuse the buffer b to send the next 64k data and so on.
The question is after ngx_http_next_body_filter, ctx->free is still NULL,
because ngx_buf_size(b) got 65536 which means that the buffer b cannot be
recycled. My guess even if the next_body_filter returns an NGX_OK, it
doesn't guarantee any of the buffers inside the ngx_chain_t can be reused.
What should I do if I want to reuse the 64k buffer?
Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,294374,294374#msg-294374