upstream keepalive: call for testing
Thomas Love
tomlove at gmail.com
Fri Jul 29 13:43:56 UTC 2011
>
> > On 26 July 2011 13:57, Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Attached patch (against 1.0.5) introduces upstream keepalive
> > > support for memcached, fastcgi and http. Note the patch is
> > > experimental and may have problems (though it passes basic smoke
> > > tests here). Testing is appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > Sounds great. Is it expected to work in this case:
> >
> > upstream fastcgi_backend {
> > server unix:/tmp/php-fpm.sock
> > keepalive 32;
> > }
>
> Yes (though I'm not sure if php is able to maintain connections
> alive, but quick look suggests it should).
Out of interest I have tested the above (on 1.0.5) under heavy load and I
have run into a problem. 40 - 90 seconds after startup all requests start
returning 502 and the log is flooded with:
[error] 2120#0: *37802582 connect() to unix:/tmp/php-fpm.sock failed (11:
Resource temporarily unavailable) while connecting to upstream, [...]
upstream: "fastcgi://unix:/tmp/php-fpm.sock:"
I am running php-fpm 0.5.14 with 32 * PHP 5.2.17 processes.
How long it takes seems to depend on request rate. It looks like the php-fpm
listen backlog is overflowing (it's at 8178, but that's normally sufficient
when keepalive is disabled).
Likely to be a php-fpm problem? Someone not reusing connections?
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/attachments/20110729/44585535/attachment.html>
More information about the nginx-devel
mailing list