Patch for nginx handling of X-Accel-Redirect URLs

Maxim Dounin mdounin at mdounin.ru
Wed Feb 1 14:38:12 UTC 2012


Hello!

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:44PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:

> But this will basically duplicate ngx_http_parse_complex_uri's 
> functionality in parse_unsafe_uri (at least part of it). Maybe 
> just try to make it less "specific"? Why not have a single 
> function for URI parsing?

The ngx_http_parse_complex_uri() function is part of a request 
parsing code, optimized for the specific task of parsing URI of a 
request in case it's complex and can't be parsed by 
ngx_http_parse_request_line().  It's not a generic URI parsing 
function and never was intended to be.

Maxim Dounin

> -- 
> Отправлено с мобильного телефона через К-9 Mail. Извините за краткость, пожалуйста.
> 
> Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> написал(а):
> 
> Hello!
> 
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:51:18AM +0400, vitalif at yourcmc.ru wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > By now, nginx does not allow urlencoded X-Accel-Redirect URLs and
> > totally fails to access files with '?' in name with it.
> > The problem was also discussed at 'nginx' maillist:
> > http://nginx.2469901.n2.nabble.com/Bug-X-Accel-Redirect-td5510716.html
> > 
> > The patch suggested there just unescaped the url in
> > ngx_http_parse_unsafe_uri(). As Maxim Dounin said, this is incorrect
> > because also unescapes the query string.
> > I want to suggest another solution - swap
> > ngx_http_parse_unsafe_uri() to ngx_http_parse_complex_uri(). The
> > patch is in attachment.
> > What can you say about it?
> 
> > This is a patch for nginx 1.1.12 handling of X-Accel-Redirect URLs:
> > run them through ngx_http_parse_complex_uri(), not ngx_http_parse_unsafe_uri().
> > It allows to handle percent-encoded URLs and complex filenames in X-Accel-Redirect
> > (for example, filenames which contain '?').
> 
> I don't think that swap with ngx_http_parse_complex_uri() is a 
> good idea. It's very specialized function to parse original 
> request uri, and in particular it modifies many private request 
> fields which shouldn't be modified by proxy.
> 
> I would rather like to see ngx_http_parse_unsafe_uri() changes 
> done right (i.e. unescape only uri, but not query string, and 
> preserve checks currently done).
> 
> Note that among standard modules the change of 
> ngx_http_parse_unsafe_uri() will also affect dav and ssi modules. 
> I think that in both cases effect will be similar to one with 
> X-Accel-Redirect, i.e. positive (though I haven't checked too 
> deep).
> 
> Maxim Dounin
> 
> _____________________________________________
> 
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
> 

> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel



More information about the nginx-devel mailing list