[PATCH] Add configuration option for the timeout for childs handling SIGTERM.

Otto van der Schaaf oschaaf at we-amp.com
Mon Mar 23 22:34:46 UTC 2015


Thanks for pointing out that the workers get signalled multiple times, I
missed that indeed. In that case, termination of the module under valgrind
takes a little longer then I thought it did, yet the problem remains the
same.
So the upper boundary of 1000 ms for the iteration has to remain fixed ? In
that case, we'll have a patch to maintain (or see if we can round up in
less time).

Thanks!


On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:39:46PM +0100, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For testing quick termination during high loads, while running with
> > valgrind, it might be useful to be able to extend the amount of time
> nginx
> > allows child processes to wrap up before sending SIGKILL.
> > For ngx_pagespeed, the current hard-coded default of 1 second seems to be
> > just short of what we need to be able to reliably test just this
> scenario,
> > so I've made a patch so we can run with different values for with and
> > without valgrind.
> > Would the following patch be acceptable?
>
> No.  Note well that current limit isn't 1 second, you are
> misunderstanding the code.  It'll signal workers multiple times,
> doubling wait time on each iteration, from 50ms to 1000ms
> including.
>
> --
> Maxim Dounin
> http://nginx.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/attachments/20150323/9e045b7f/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx-devel mailing list