[PATCH] MIME: Added avif/avifs types.
ryo.hirafuji at link-u.co.jp
Tue Feb 4 12:41:48 UTC 2020
Thanks for quick response!
OK, I understand.
I will submit this patch again when major browsers support AVIF.
2020年2月4日(火) 21:32 Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru>:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:19:18PM +0900, Ryo Hirafuji wrote:
> > Thank you for reviewing, Dounin!
> > Yeah, I know that image/avif or image/avif-sequence are not registered in
> > IANA list yet,
> > but image/webp is also not registered in IANA list, isn't it?
> > WebP and AVIF are similar in some points.
> > They are both based on Royalty-free Video format, VP8 for WebP and AV1
> > (based upon VP9) for AVIF.
> > AVIF is already supported in Windows, and it is planned to support in
> > Chrome and Firefox in the near future.
> > So I think it is worth to add "image/avif" to mime.types, if "image/webp"
> > is worth to be listed in mime.types.
> > Please tell your opinion!
> The major difference is that image/webp and video/webm are
> supported by browsers and used in the wild, while image/avif
> and image/avif-sequence are not.
> As previously suggested, if you want to use these types in your
> configuration, consider modifying mime.types locally or extending
> the existing MIME types list using the "types" directive
>  https://caniuse.com/#feat=webp
>  https://caniuse.com/#feat=webm
> Maxim Dounin
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel at nginx.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the nginx-devel