Re: QUIC: position of RTT and congestion

朱宇(黎叔) lishu.zy at alibaba-inc.com
Thu Dec 1 10:57:54 UTC 2022


Thank you for the reply. And one question follows:

Will the patches from community of such features be accepted , or should wait for official updates?
​

 ------------------原始邮件 ------------------
发件人:Vladimir Homutov via nginx-devel <nginx-devel at nginx.org>
发送时间:Wed Nov 30 20:33:18 2022
收件人:Vladimir Homutov via nginx-devel <nginx-devel at nginx.org>
抄送:Vladimir Homutov <vl at inspert.ru>
主题:Re: QUIC: position of RTT and congestion
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:10:29PM +0800, Yu Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>     As described in "rfc 9002 6. Loss Detection",  "RTT and congestion
>     control are properties of the path", so moves first_rtt,
>     latest_rtt, avg_rtt, min_rtt, rttvar and congestion from
>     ngx_quic_connection_t to struct ngx_quic_path_t looks more
>     reasonable?

yes, you are right.

Currently per-path calculations are not implemented, as well as path mtu
discovery and some other things.

_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list -- nginx-devel at nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-devel-leave at nginx.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/attachments/20221201/6d8eadcc/attachment.htm>


More information about the nginx-devel mailing list