Upstream failures against Mongrels instances

[Ken]

i meet the same problem too.

On 8/14/07, Alexander Staubo <alex at purefiction.net> wrote:
>
> On 8/13/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius at gmail.com> wrote:
> >         When you say you kill and respawn the mongrels, do you mean you
> kill
> > -9 them and then restart?
>
> No, I mean SIGTERM. This signals a graceful stop, equivalent to
> calling the stop method on all Mongrel listeners.
>
> So there's no reason why connections should be going down gracefully.
> However, Nginx ought to behave correctly even when a process is
> terminated with SIGKILL -- ie., it should follow whatever
> proxy_next_upstream is set to.
>
> Thanks for the Monit script; I don't know if we will ever use Monit
> (we outsource our sysadmin/management, so it's mostly out of our
> hands), but it might come in handy.
>
> Alexander.
>
>


-- 
君問歸期未有期，巴山夜雨漲秋池。何當共剪西窗燭，卻話巴山夜雨時。
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20070814/388d245a/attachment.html>