How are downed upstream servers detected as alive again?

[Aníbal Rojas]

I think you can get most of the benefits of the healt checking just by
having Monit or God checking the the upstreams with a frequence higher
than the fail_timeout, also the time required to star the backend
server should be considered.

--
Aníbal

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:26 AM, mike <mike503 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am having the same desire, but it might be out of nginx scope.
>
>  You're looking for a healthchecking load balancer. Not a proxy. nginx
>  is a reverse proxy at most.
>
>  I am using it right now as a load balancer myself, and it would be
>  great if it was dynamic like a normal layer7 capable load balancer
>  with healthchecking. You could do this manually, by writing an include
>  file (easiest) that has the upstream servers listed in it, and include
>  it from the main nginx configuration. You'd have to reload nginx every
>  time though...
>
>
>
>
>  On 4/23/08, Rt Ibmer <rtibmx at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  > > This also explains, in the writing about fail_timeout, how long
>  > > nginx considers a failed upstream server down for.Thank you for the clarification. Wow, I did not realize that is what the fail_timeout was for. I had seen that, but thought it was related to how long the timeout had to be before being considered down.
>  >
>  > I really wish it worked differently.  For instance with Pound, you specify a retry interval and it automatically checks downed servers at that interval without first redirecting any requests to it. Any chance we may see that type of enhancement in the future?
>  >
>  > For instance in my case I'll then want to keep the fail_timeout short, like 60 seconds.  So this means every 60 seconds nginx will assume the downed server is back up, and send requests to it only to find that it is not back up yet and causing users to experience the delays. I will use the other params to keep the delays short (like 3s).  However every minute some users will be experiencing a 3s delay.
>  >
>  > I've recently switched to nginx from pound and let me just say that nginx is so much better in just about every other way its not even a contest.  However I must say that pound does have a clear advantage in this regarding, in that it will not direct clients to a downed box until some other background process it runs verifies it can get a response. At least, that is my understanding of how things went.
>  >
>  > For as robust of a package that nginx is and performance oriented it is a bit surprising that it would blindly assume a downed box is back up just because x interval has passed.  Would love to see it verify things first before redirecting real users to it.  Thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback and a truly incredible tool!
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >      ____________________________________________________________________________________
>  > Be a better friend, newshound, and
>  > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>  >
>  >
>  >