Direct Routing of load balancing would be added in feature?

[Delta Yeh]

+1 point for such QOS

2008/8/1 Tit Petric <black at scene-si.org>

> Request scheduling as in queuing with priority, QoS?
>
> Meaning, one or more location should have a higher priority in
> completing the request, by going into the front of the queue?
>
> For example, you have 1000 requests per second, and 10 of them are for
> the location /realtime.jpg, and you want those requests to jump in front
> of the queue and return the responses ASAP?
>
> Chancey wrote:
> > nginx is great ! but it has only one mode and one request scheduling
> > in Load balance.
> > if it has more options in load balance. it will be perfect
> > 2008-08-01
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chancey
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *发件人：* Igor Sysoev
> > *发送时间：* 2008-08-01 13:49:26
> > *收件人：* nginx at sysoev.ru
> > *抄送：*
> > *主题：* Re: Memcached module -- unix domain socket support? (too many
> > TIME_WAITs..)
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:54:03PM -0700, Kon Wilms wrote:
> > > I have a pool of memcached servers running on localhost with
> > > connection to nginx, feeding motion jpeg data out via static JPEGs to
> > > a flash application. The load is pretty high on the server because of
> > > this with each client running 3 GETs from memcached every second (i.e.
> > > 3fps).
> > >
> > > Nginx works fine, however, the problem I have is that thousands of
> > > TIME_WAITs are created from the memcached GET requests, which I would
> > > like to eliminate. I've already tuned the kernel but this has not
> > > reduced it enough to handle a couple thousand viewers on the server.
> > >
> > > Is there any way to connect nginx's memcached module to memcached via
> > > unix domain socket or perhaps UDP, or any other ideas on how to fix
> > > this problem?
> > Adding unix socket support to ngx_http_memcached_module should be easy,
> > but I'm not sure if memcached suppot unix sockets.
> > BTW why do you serve local images from memcached ?
> > It's better for both CPU and memory to serve them from local filesystem
> > using sendfile.
> > --
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20080801/84fb525b/attachment.html>