HTTP PUT for file uploads
Michael
nginx at thismetalsky.org
Fri Aug 1 18:52:11 MSD 2008
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 15:17:20, Phillip B Oldham said...
> Exactly - 2GB is going to be hell to upload. At least with FTP it can use
> multiple ports for data transfer. And with a web interface I'd expect users
> to get annoyed with clicking "back" accidentally or having their
> email-client open a link using the same window. With FTP you can
> "background" the process.
Yeah, users would do something like that... I wonder how youtube deals with it?
Those uploads take a loooong time.. do users get frustrated and abort the
transfer?
Handling the upload in a web server or backend application wouldn't be hard at
all though, it's mostly just handling the user that's the problem.
> As for firewalls; just use an active connection rather than passive. Job
> done. You'll loose the benefit of the different ports, though.
There's more to it than that... but again, not nginx related.
--
Michael Stella | IT Systems Architect
PGP: 1024D/BC3FF6D4 2BC2 A79B 88D1 218A B32B ED7A 2EC2 1206 BC3F F6D4
Got my sights on the stars, won't get that far but I'll try anyway.
- Rush
More information about the nginx
mailing list