trouble

[Charles McGarvey]

Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:24:45PM +0800, walt wrote:
> 
>> I am not very sure,the image is 27.88KB itself.
> 
> Then I do not understand what 457 and 699 mean.
> 
>> 2008/8/15 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0800, walt wrote:
>>>
>>>> I use httpwatch to test a same image in apache and nginx.The result is
>>>>                size
>>>> apache     457
>>>> nginx        699
>>>> I think that is where the question arises.
>>> What is this size ? Size of the image or size of image + HTTP header size ?
>>> What the size of the image itself ?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Igor Sysoev
>>> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>>>
>>>
> 

Maybe I don't understand this whole discussion, but why doesn't someone 
just tcpdump both transactions and _see_ what the difference is?  I 
can't imagine a system admin would take a week to hypothesize about 
config files when they could just dump the transactions to determine 
what is going on.

Chaz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20080814/024b3652/attachment.pgp>