trouble

[Denis S. Filimonov]

A wild guess: could it be the error page?

On Friday 15 August 2008 01:46:07 walt wrote:
> So do I,but why apache's is smaller than nginx,this is ture.
>
> 2008/8/15 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>
>
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:24:45PM +0800, walt wrote:
> > > I am not very sure,the image is 27.88KB itself.
> >
> > Then I do not understand what 457 and 699 mean.
> >
> > > 2008/8/15 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0800, walt wrote:
> > > > > I use httpwatch to test a same image in apache and nginx.The result
> >
> > is
> >
> > > > >                size
> > > > > apache     457
> > > > > nginx        699
> > > > > I think that is where the question arises.
> > > >
> > > > What is this size ? Size of the image or size of image + HTTP header
> >
> > size ?
> >
> > > > What the size of the image itself ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Igor Sysoev
> > > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> >
> > --
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/



-- 
Denis.