PHP-FPM Performance

[Mathew Davies]

I forgot to add.

Would it be more beneficial to have NGinx pass off the PHP requests to
Apache as it runs PHP as a module?

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Mathew Davies
<thepixeldeveloper at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Marcos. I am planning to use a VPS at Slicehost, but I have created a
> virtual machine with the same specification at home to replicate it.
>
> Reinis. That had little effect on the end result.
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Marcos Neves <marcos.neves at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I totally agree. What you are really trying to banchmark is the time
>> to php respond to nginx and nginx respond to the client.
>> Just it.
>>
>> Marcos Neves
>> +55 44 3263-8132
>> +55 44 9918-8488
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/12/22 Reinis Rozitis <r at roze.lv>:
>>> Just a note - dont test with <? phpinfo(); ?> do something like <? echo
>>> 'Hello world!'; ?> and test then..
>>> Because phpinfo() is pretty bloated and intensive (in the past also even
>>> with memory leaks).
>>>
>>>
>>> rr
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mathew Davies"
>>> <thepixeldeveloper at googlemail.com>
>>> To: <nginx at sysoev.ru>
>>> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 8:37 PM
>>> Subject: PHP-FPM Performance
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently using nginx/0.7.27 + PHP 5.2.8 with the fpm patch on
>>>> Ubuntu Server 8.10 with 256 MB RAM. Nginx is serving static files very
>>>> fast at 1,500 req/s while serving a phpinfo(); page will drop right
>>>> down to 300 req/s. This performance is nothing to be sniffed at with
>>>> the current specifications of the machine, but I'm wandering if there
>>>> is any room to squeeze more performance from the php side of things.
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> -Mathew Davies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>