mod_rails aka mod_rack aka mod_ruby

[Sean Allen]

less moving parts? easier deployment? fewer points of failure?

On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Rapsey wrote:

> What advantage would mod_ruby have over simply proxying requests to  
> Mongrel?
>
>
> Sergej
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Michał Jaszczyk <jasiu85 at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> I think my previous post didn't reach the list. Sorry if you get a
> duplicate, it's my first post :).
>
> Mike
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michał Jaszczyk <jasiu85 at gmail.com>
> Date: 2008/6/5
> Subject: mod_rails aka mod_rack aka mod_ruby
> To: nginx at sysoev.ru
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I did a little research on how Nginx supports Ruby/Rails and if I'm
> right, you can only do proxy or FastCGI to make it working. So I
> thought... There's this mod_wsgi module for Python apps which I have
> recently used and I find it really great. Why not do the same for
> Ruby/Rails? I'm a CS student, I'm looking for a subject for my masters
> thesis and I thought that maybe I could create such module. I have
> some questions:
>
> 1) Do you think that making mod_ruby/mod_rack/mod_rails is a good  
> idea?
> 2) Do you know if someone is already working on something like that?
> 3) Do you think it would be useful?
> 4) Would you/your friends/collegues be happy if you had such a module
> for Nginx? :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20080605/ef4ae049/attachment.html>