which one is better?

[Igor Sysoev]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:44:28PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> I already tried this
> 
> Here's the config
> 
>     fastcgi_cache_path  /data/nginx/cache  levels=1:2 keys_zone=one:10m
> inactive=7d  max_size=200m;
>     fastcgi_temp_path   /data/nginx/temp;
> 
>         location @joomla {
>             fastcgi_pass   127.0.0.1:9000;
>             fastcgi_param  SCRIPT_FILENAME  /home/kompastv/web/index.php;
>             fastcgi_cache                   one;
>             fastcgi_cache_key               127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
>             fastcgi_cache_valid             200  1h;
> 
> /data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
> 
> root     28119  0.0  0.0  13940   496 ?        Ss   15:41   0:00 nginx:
> master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
> nginx	   28120  1.3  0.2  17328  4408 ?        R    15:41   0:01 nginx:
> worker process
> nginx    28122  1.6  0.2  17384  4540 ?        S    15:41   0:01 nginx:
> worker process
> nginx    28123  0.0  0.0  14096   800 ?        S    15:41   0:00 nginx:
> cache manager process
> 
> is there somethink i've missed?

Does fastcgi return Expires or Cache-Control headers which may forbid caching ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
> To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> 
> > Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same format as
> > proxy_cache?
> 
> Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
> 
> The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
> 
>       fastcgi_cache_key   localhost:9000$request_uri;
> 
> while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
> 
> proxy_cache_key  $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
> Igor
> > Sysoev
> > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> > To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > 
> > > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> > > 
> > > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> > > 
> > > Or
> > > 
> > > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> > > 
> > > Anybody knows about this?
> > 
> > Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache too.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
> 

-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/