which one is better?

[Glen Lumanau]

http://pastebin.com/d45d76e4d



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Igor
Sysoev
Sent: 21 April 2009 17:57
To: nginx at sysoev.ru
Subject: Re: which one is better?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:51:57PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:

> [root at mp-ws-06 nginx-0.7.52]# tail -f /var/log/nginx/error.log | grep data
> 2009/04/21 17:51:21 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
> "/data/nginx/cache/3/06/6fecda1e6dc4d639bbfabfe771b63063"
> 2009/04/21 17:51:21 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
> "/data/nginx/cache/8/00/7df93c5fa8eb0301382ec66dc9e54008"
> 2009/04/21 17:51:23 [debug] 30425#0: cache file:
> "/data/nginx/cache/5/db/bc8df465ca5a5c053713a34370befdb5"
> 2009/04/21 17:51:24 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
> "/data/nginx/cache/5/db/bc8df465ca5a5c053713a34370befdb5"
> 2009/04/21 17:51:24 [debug] 30424#0: cache file:
> "/data/nginx/cache/c/94/179da50f035455138b0ac1070c64494c"
> 
> [root at mp-ws-06 nginx-0.7.52]# cd /data/nginx/cache/
> [root at mp-ws-06 cache]# ls -al
> total 8
> drwx------ 2 kompastv root 4096 Apr 21 15:36 .
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root     root 4096 Apr 21 15:36 ..

Could you run

egrep 'cacheable|error|crit' /var/log/nginx/error.log

?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
Igor
> Sysoev
> Sent: 21 April 2009 17:32
> To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> Subject: Re: which one is better?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:02:57PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> 
> > How do i check that? Becase i'm using default configuration
> 
> If you use Firefox:
> http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org
> 
> Could you create debug log ?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of
> Igor
> > Sysoev
> > Sent: 21 April 2009 15:54
> > To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:44:28PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > 
> > > I already tried this
> > > 
> > > Here's the config
> > > 
> > >     fastcgi_cache_path  /data/nginx/cache  levels=1:2
keys_zone=one:10m
> > > inactive=7d  max_size=200m;
> > >     fastcgi_temp_path   /data/nginx/temp;
> > > 
> > >         location @joomla {
> > >             fastcgi_pass   127.0.0.1:9000;
> > >             fastcgi_param  SCRIPT_FILENAME
> /home/kompastv/web/index.php;
> > >             fastcgi_cache                   one;
> > >             fastcgi_cache_key
127.0.0.1:9000$request_uri;
> > >             fastcgi_cache_valid             200  1h;
> > > 
> > > /data/nginx/cache and /data/nginx/temp is still empty
> > > 
> > > root     28119  0.0  0.0  13940   496 ?        Ss   15:41   0:00
nginx:
> > > master process /etc/nginxnew/sbin/nginx -c /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
> > > nginx	   28120  1.3  0.2  17328  4408 ?        R    15:41   0:01
> nginx:
> > > worker process
> > > nginx    28122  1.6  0.2  17384  4540 ?        S    15:41   0:01
nginx:
> > > worker process
> > > nginx    28123  0.0  0.0  14096   800 ?        S    15:41   0:00
nginx:
> > > cache manager process
> > > 
> > > is there somethink i've missed?
> > 
> > Does fastcgi return Expires or Cache-Control headers which may forbid
> > caching ?
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf
Of
> > Igor
> > > Sysoev
> > > Sent: 21 April 2009 15:32
> > > To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> > > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:10:31PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is there any help page regarding fastcgi_cache? Or it's the same
> format
> > as
> > > > proxy_cache?
> > > 
> > > Yes, just s/proxy/fastcgi/.
> > > 
> > > The single difference is that fastcgi cache requires
> > > 
> > >       fastcgi_cache_key   localhost:9000$request_uri;
> > > 
> > > while proxy_cache may use default one, similar to this:
> > > 
> > > proxy_cache_key  $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Igor
> > > > Sysoev
> > > > Sent: 21 April 2009 14:41
> > > > To: nginx at sysoev.ru
> > > > Subject: Re: which one is better?
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:20:05PM +0700, Glen Lumanau wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I still wonder which one is better for performance
> > > > > 
> > > > > Pure nginx + php-fpm
> > > > > 
> > > > > Or
> > > > > 
> > > > > Nginx + apache2 + proxy_cache
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anybody knows about this?
> > > > 
> > > > Can not say about apache2 vs php-fpm, but you can use fastcgi_cache
> too.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Igor Sysoev
> > > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Igor Sysoev
> > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Igor Sysoev
> > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
> 

-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/