nginx-0.7.52

[István]

2009/4/21 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Roger Pack wrote:
>
> > >> I realized that during performance testing, all what I can tell you:
> use the
> > >> httperf instead if you have a chance.
> > >> (do not forget to modify the FD_SETSIZE to higher value)
> > >
> > > BTW, nginx/Windows is currently build with FD_SETSIZE.
> >
> > did you mean "without defining FD_SETSIZE" or "with defining it?"
>
> I meant that nginx is built with FD_SETSIZE=1024
>


is it enough? haven't you seen performance issues with this configuration?


>
> > Note that ruby recently went through some acrobatics to "dynamically"
> > resize their fd_sets if you try to include > FD_SETSIZE file descriptors
> > in them :)
> > http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/repositories/revision/ruby-19?rev=21487
> > http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/755
>
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
>


-- 
the sun shines for all
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20090421/32ab7db9/attachment.html>