502 bad gateway, something about the header?

Joe frumentius at gmail.com
Sun Aug 30 00:51:06 MSD 2009


Igor,

May I also asking too?
I am trying to do "getconf PAGESIZE" and the answer is "4096".
I am also often have "502 Bad Gateway" page, and I change the settings to:

fastcgi_connect_timeout 60;
fastcgi_send_timeout 180;
fastcgi_read_timeout 180;
fastcgi_buffer_size 128k;
fastcgi_buffers 4 256k;
fastcgi_busy_buffers_size 256k;
fastcgi_temp_file_write_size 256k;
fastcgi_intercept_errors on;

Are those settings to over and make the cpu and memory work harder?

Thank You in advanced Igor.



Regards,
Joe


2009/8/30 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>

> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:35:47PM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote:
>
> > fastcgi_buffers 32 8k;
> >
> > I have that already...
>
> Try
>
> fastcgi_buffer_size  16k;
> fastcgi_buffers      16  16k;
>
> fastcgi_buffer_size is buffer where response header is read.
> It may has different size as compared to fastcgi_buffers.
>
> > 2009/8/29 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>:
> > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:10:43AM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does anyone see a problem here?  The fastcgi parser returns back a -2,
> > >> instead of 0 on a normal request. I don't see anything wrong with this
> > >> header - the only thing that sticks out is the "//" - but still - I
> > >> think this is a bug in nginx. Why does it say upstream split a header
> > >> line? There are no \n \0 \r etc...
> > >>
> > >> Any help is appreciated - Igor, I sent you a larger chunk of the log
> > >> privately unedited (I edited the hostnames to protect the innocent on
> > >> this)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> 2009/08/28 12:17:01 [debug] 20714#0: *7231991 http fastcgi header:
> > >> "Set-Cookie:
> IBBUSER=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;
> > >> domain=.foo.com; expires=Sun, 27-Sep-2009 19:17:01 GMT; path=/"
> > >> 2009/08/28 12:17:01 [debug] 20714#0: *7231991 http fastcgi parser: -2
> > >> 2009/08/28 12:17:01 [debug] 20714#0: *7231991 upstream split a header
> > >> line in FastCGI records
> > >> 2009/08/28 12:17:01 [error] 20714#0: *7231991 upstream sent too big
> > >> header while reading response header from upstream, client:
> > >> 134.134.139.72, server: ssl.foo.com, request: "POST
> > >> /en-us/login/?TARGET=http%3A%2F%2Ffoo.com%2Fpage%2F HTTP/1.1",
> > >> upstream: "fastcgi://127.0.0.1:11021", host: "ssl.foo.com", referrer:
> > >> "http://foo.com/en-us/login"
> > >
> > > What nginx version do use ? In 0.8.8 there are some bugfixes
> > > in handling FastCGI headers split in records. However, in your case
> > > it seems there is not enough fastcgi_buffer_size.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Igor Sysoev
> > > http://sysoev.ru/en/
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20090830/38ebacd4/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx mailing list