Are these rules ok?

[Merlin]

I like "fastcgi_path_info" because it is most concise; however, I think
"fastcgi_split_path_info" is the better name because it more clearly
expresses the idea of the directive and its effects.

Also, while we're filling your head with ideas during vacation, I must say
that just the other day I really wanted location captures!  I ended up
finding another way to do what I wanted cleanly, but I can see myself
[ab]using such a feature for all kinds of things in the future...

Thanks and enjoy the rest of your vacation :).

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Igor Clark <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> Igor Sysoev wrote:
>
> > OK, then I will plan to simplify PATH_INFO extraction some like this:
> >
> >        fastcgi_path_info   ^(.+\.php)(/.+);
> >
> > the directive will place 1st capture inside $fastcgi_script_name
> > and second one inside $fastcgi_path_info.
> >
> > Other name variants:
> >
> >        fastcgi_separate_path_info
> >        fastcgi_split_path_info
> >
> > What name is better in English ?
>
> Hi, this will be useful, thanks Igor.
> I think fastcgi_split_path_info is best.
>
> Cheers
> Igor Clark
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20090105/d52f2a03/attachment.html>