Cache questions

[Marcus Clyne]

Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>
>
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:09:34PM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> It is now logging "HIT" or "MISS" for each request in that location 
>>> block.
>>>
>>> It is safe to assume that with fastcgi_cache_min_uses set at 2 that 
>>> for every first miss shared memory is allocated, that the file is 
>>> written to the cache on the second miss, and that each logged "hit" 
>>> is an actual serve from the cache (third and subsequent requests for 
>>> the file)?
>>>     
>>
>> Yes. Currently, there are "MISS", "EXPIRED", "STALE", "UPDATING", and 
>> "HIT"
>> states. If you will think out a good name for state when miss is just 
>> counted,
>> but not cached, I will make this state.
>>
>>
>>   
> "MISS-NOT_CACHED"  fairly well tells the story, if it's not too long. 
> Otherwise  "MISS-NC".
>
> Or perhaps "MISS-COUNTING".
>
> Jim
>
>
How about "UNCACHED"?

Marcus