mogilefs module 1.0.2
Michael Shadle
mike503 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 19:57:30 MSD 2009
Oh. You're right. It is server {} blocks already, not http {}.
I don't know why I thought I had two different server blocks.
2009/7/27 Igor Sysoev <is at rambler-co.ru>:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 02:44:11PM -0700, Michael Shadle wrote:
>
>> Just for discussion sake why is that? I actually have the same
>> instance of nginx with two separate http{} blocks. One for mogstored
>
> Do you mean
>
> http {
> ...
> }
>
> http {
> ...
> }
>
> in one configuration ? This setup is not supported (and never supposed to
> be supported) and may lead to unexpected results.
>
>> and one for normal web serving. It might even be possible to have it
>> under the same http block. I never looked into it that much.
>>
>> I guess explaining the pros and cons of doing it that way vs. Using
>> the module would be good info to know.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen at grid.net.ru
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Yes, but making a mogstored node out of it is a bad idea.
>> >
>> >Michael Shadle wrote:
>> >>So this means this module now handles the DAV requests as well, so it
>> >>can be a mogstored node?
>> >>nginx technically already supported that :) However this could be
>> >>more
>> >>efficient, etc. I'm wondering if I am understanding this properly.
>> >>On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Valery
>> >>Kholodkov<valery+nginxen at grid.net.ru> wrote:
>> >>>Changes in version 1.0.2 (July 25 2009):
>> >>>* Added feature: directive mogilefs_methods and support for PUT
>> >>>and DELETE
>> >>>methods
>> >>>* Added feature: dynamic evaluation of tracker name
>> >>>* Added feature: ability to pass noverify parameter to tracker
>> >>>
>> >>>The first 2 features were commissioned by GG Network SA (gadu-gadu.pl
>> >>>).
>> >>>These features allow write access to MogileFS using nginx, as well
>> >>>as
>> >>>locating of tracker dynamically. The Gadu-Gadu developers were
>> >>>very kind to
>> >>>test these features. Hopefully there are no major issues.
>> >>>
>> >>>The noverify parameter instructs MogileFS tracker to avoid
>> >>>querying the
>> >>>database for location of files if possible and use cached results,
>> >>>thus
>> >>>eliminating some of the database server load.
>> >>>
>> >>>The details on the following page:
>> >>>http://www.grid.net.ru/nginx/mogilefs.en.html
>> >>>
>> >>>Feel free to contact me if you have problems with this!
>> >
>> >--
>> >Best regards,
>> >Valery Kholodkov
>> >
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
> http://sysoev.ru/en/
>
>
More information about the nginx
mailing list