Anyone using urchin?

[Max]

Hi Dave,

Million thanks. Urchin can now process the nginx log file.

Max

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Dave Cheney <dave at cheney.net> wrote:

> I've used this log format to produce urchin compatible log files.
>
>  log_format urchin '$remote_addr $http_host - [$time_local] "$request"
> $status $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" "$http_user_agent" "$http_cookie"';
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 02/03/2009, at 12:48 AM, Max wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> I am using Urchin to process the log file. It works fine for apache log
>> file. But if I process nginx log file, it seems urchin can't understand the
>> nginx log file format. What should I change the log format of nginx in order
>> to process by urchin? I am using the default log format as follow:
>>
>>    log_format  main  '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] $request '
>>                      '"$status" $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" '
>>                      '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"';
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Max
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20090302/e88ffdb7/attachment.html>