Viability of nginx instead of hardware load balancer?

David Murphy david at icewatermedia.com
Tue Sep 22 01:09:21 MSD 2009


Sorry JM, yes I meant "now" not "not".

Glad this discussion helped.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nginx at sysoev.ru [mailto:owner-nginx at sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of John
Moore
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:28 PM
To: nginx at sysoev.ru
Subject: Re: Viability of nginx instead of hardware load balancer?

David Murphy wrote:
> However I digress this topic is dead at this point the user has been  
> shown several different ways where  using nginx vs a hardware platform 
> could be done. Its not his job to plan and test it for his needs.  
> Theory over practice and all that.
>
>   
I'm not quite sure what you mean by this (unless you meant to type 'now' 
instead of 'not'). I'm very grateful for the help given here, which has made
me more confident that we can use nginx for the task. It's now time to do
some testing.

JM







More information about the nginx mailing list