Image Hosting

SplitIce mat999 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 11:49:53 MSD 2010


If its just serving static files nginx should perform better without
caching, unless they are calling PHP for all images (in which case thats the
root of their performance problem)

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, yung <innobak at gmail.com> wrote:

> should be able to use a cache with either nginx+caching or Squid Cache.
>
>
> 2010/10/14 Indo Php <iptablez at yahoo.com>:
> > hi there,
> > we have an image hosting, and of course we're using Nginx!
> > Now on we're having problem with disk i/o. With 200GB of images.
> > Is there any recommendation for this matter? Nginx configuration or
> > Hardware/other software configuration?
> > We already used Dual Quad Core 3Ghz, 8 GB RAM, 6x73GB 15k SCSI server
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nginx mailing list
> > nginx at nginx.org
> > http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>



-- 
Warez Scene <http://thewarezscene.org> Free Rapidshare
Downloads<http://www.nexusddl.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20101014/b76aa899/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx mailing list