Nginx Vs Apache in Dynamic Page

[Joe]

Did you mean better means easy and secure?



Regards,
Joe


On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, <iptablez at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Yes that's what I'm asking.. Which one is better for dynamic website
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NeWorld <admin at agonija.eu>
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:36:34
> To: <nginx at nginx.org>
> Reply-To: nginx at nginx.org
> Subject: Re: Nginx Vs Apache in Dynamic Page
>
> Apache can handle php-fpm too, but efficiency depends on php-fpm. I
> think, better way is use one server.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Indo Php <iptablez at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The website is now running Nginx + PHP-fpm.
> > But I've heard, that Nginx (for static files) with Apache as a backend,
> will
> > be faster. Because apache can nicely handle dynamic page.
> > Is that true?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nginx mailing list
> > nginx at nginx.org
> > http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pagarbiai.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20101019/c5925318/attachment.html>