HTTP/1.1 backend

[SplitIce]

Indeed I found that in my research but I cant find any real documentation on
its keep alive system/backend pooling. This leads me to beleive it just
fowards the keep alive onto the backend server, which is not preferable. Any
ideas?

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Ryan Malayter <malayter at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:01 AM, SplitIce <mat999 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has anyone here had any luck using a 2 layer proxy system to provide
> > keep-alive support to nignx's backend.
> >
> > My goal is to setup a system like thihi
> > User -> Nginx -> SoftwareX -> Backend (Different Country) -> SoftwareX ->
> > Nginx ->User
> > So in other words another layer.
> >
> > Ive done some research and found perlbal and vicompress. Any other
> software
> > that supports a HTTP/1.1 backend pool (keep alive) that you know of? Any
> > recomendations?
> >
> > Oh and BTW to anyone who says that it wont matter, it will, it will
> remove
> > the need for a round trip in the proxy process (19ms), big saving.
> >
> I think Apache Traffic Server may do what you need:
> http://trafficserver.apache.org/
>
> --
> RPM
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>



-- 
Warez Scene <http://thewarezscene.org> Free Rapidshare
Downloads<http://www.nexusddl.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20101026/d16b4980/attachment.html>