server performance issue

[Phil Bayfield]

Your formulas look interesting, will give them a try next time I'm doing
some optimising.
Normally I would just make a rough guess based off req/sec, execution times
etc and fine tune with ab.

On 26 October 2010 11:58, SplitIce <mat999 at gmail.com> wrote:

> ive found that if you have no blocking functions in php, aka its CPU bound
> then number of  CPU cores+1 is the most efficient. If it has mysql (most
> likely does) and other IO bound operations then *2 or *3 is fine. values
> between 20-30 are common in decent scale web servers, in fact on my i7 8gb
> ram I run 20, on my amd x2 4gb ram I run 15.
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Phil Bayfield <phil at techlightenment.com>wrote:
>
>> Sorry didn't read you config before posting, you already have this. :)
>>
>> You probably need to reduce the number of child processes, more is not
>> better.
>>
>> On intensive PHP applications I've found lower is better.
>>
>> For example, if you have 100 concurrent connections, this doesn't mean
>> you necessarily need 100 PHP-FPM children.
>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx at nginx.org
>> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Warez Scene <http://thewarezscene.org> Free Rapidshare Downloads<http://www.nexusddl.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20101026/8f1a9534/attachment-0001.html>