Segfault in nginx 1.0.5

Maxim Dounin mdounin at
Mon Aug 8 09:12:32 UTC 2011


On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:41:11AM +0200, Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote:

> Hi,
> Am 08.08.2011 08:48, schrieb Maxim Dounin:
> > This problem is specific to error_page 400, as 400 means "bad 
> > request" and request may not have some required parts set (due to 
> > being actually bad).
> but in this case an error or warning or whatsoever would be better
> than just a segfault, right? ;)
> Don't want to bug at it, i just think that catching such config
> problems would be good for the future (and as i'm not a coder
> in general, i cannot fix it by myself...).

I specifically outlined in my original reply that this *is* a bug 
(and it obviously needs fixing).

Maxim Dounin

More information about the nginx mailing list