upload issue when NGINX actes as reverse proxy

Web George webgreatwall at gmail.com
Fri Feb 25 20:33:27 MSK 2011


Do anyone meet the same issue? Is there a workaround?

How does it solve the issue?
If NGINX works as reverse proxy, it seems the issue is easy to reproduce. ?

thanks
George

2011/2/25 Web George <webgreatwall at gmail.com>

> thanks for your info.
>
> Can NGINX bypass and sent it directly to backend ?
>
> thanks
> George
>
> 2011/2/25 Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen at grid.net.ru>
>
>
>> ----- Valery Kholodkov <valery+nginxen at grid.net.ru> wrote:
>> >
>> > ----- Web George <webgreatwall at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Thanks Weibin's feedback.
>> > >
>> > > I searched a mail with the same issue.
>> > >  ref:  http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,5506,146254
>> > >
>> > > >From the update of Igor, it should be an issue and would be
>> developed.
>> > >
>> > > We do not know the latest status...
>> > >
>> > > It seems that UPLOAD module can not solve the issue.
>> >
>> > No, it doesn't seem so. upload module is especially designed for solving
>> this issue.
>>
>> Correction: yes, you are right and I am wrong, as long as you are talking
>> about streaming uploads to the backend.
>>
>> However, if you want to stream the entire request body without
>> modifications, why don't you make clients send requests directly to the
>> backend?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Valery Kholodkov
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx at nginx.org
>> http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20110225/b455cabc/attachment.html>


More information about the nginx mailing list