So is "rewrite_by_lua" also evil?
Nginx User
nginx at nginxuser.net
Sat Oct 15 11:37:01 UTC 2011
On 15 October 2011 13:07, agentzh <agentzh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nginx User <nginx at nginxuser.net> wrote:
>> All in all, I have come to realise that ngx_lua is slightly evil in
>> that unexpected things can happen. As with "if" however, evil
>> understood is evil avoided :-)
>>
>
> The ngx_lua module won't play seamlessly with ngx_rewrite because
> ngx_rewrite does use internal hacks and tricks to make things work. So
> I'd recommend use Lua to do as much as possible and avoid using
> ngx_rewrite's directives but simple "set".
>
Would it mean "if" blocks? The last, redirect, permanent etc flags
available to rewrite are very convenient.
>> Any thoughts on Marcus' points earlier on clearing the ctx in the core?
>
> Well, there're indeed cases that we do want to retain module contexts
> during a jump but I've already managed to "abuse" the post_subrequest
> mechanism to save the pointer to my module's context and later restore
> it in my output header filter, for example. (See how I do this in my
> ngx_lua module for ngx.location.capture.)
>
> But on the other hand, if I do want to clear my module's context
> before a internal redirection, then there's no easy way to do that
> myself.
>
>> Seems to suggest that may cause problems elsewhere and that it is
>> better to be handled at the module level.
>
> No, this is impossible to handle that fully on the module level. For
> example, if you do use ngx_upload module's upload_pass instead of
> ngx_lua or ngx_echo to do the jump, then it'll still break
> rewrite_by_lua and access_by_lua (at least).
>
>> Seems logical as whether it was originally an oversight or not,
>> changing it now would break other stuff.
>>
>
> I doubt it :) Unless one only jump to named locations and never to
> normal locations. The behaviors here are already inconsistent and very
> hard to work around.
Pardon my ignorance. I thought it was the same thing.
Anyway, Marcus has lent his weight to your call so hopefully it will
get picked up and implemeted.
More information about the nginx
mailing list