Serving direct static image vs via php
etrader
nginx-forum at nginx.us
Thu Mar 22 14:13:09 UTC 2012
Serving static files is the native behavior of nginx, and when we use
gateway for scripting, it needs more works by nginx. Thus, loading a php
file should take more time than loading an image file.
I compare the speed of loading an image file with serving via php by
$image=imagecreatefromjpeg($imagepath);
header('Content-Type: image/jpeg');
imagejpeg($image);
Surprisingly (at least to me), the speed of loading the image via php
was 50 - 70% faster than loading the original image file directly. What
is the reason for this peculiar behavior?
I tested with Pingdom. The difference was in Receive step, which is
associated with downloading the data.
Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,224228,224228#msg-224228
More information about the nginx
mailing list