Good Directive vs Bad Directives

[Francis Daly]

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:30:18AM -0700, antituhan wrote:

Hi there,

> I've read on http://wiki.nginx.org/Pitfalls, what the different between bad
> and good? Any info related to this issue? Such as cpu load or mem load? 

The short version is: if you don't understand them, just don't do the
bad ones.

The more useful information is:

that's a wiki, so what I see when I read it now may not be what you saw
when you read it. And it might be different tomorrow. And I'm not going
to help the archaeologists by being explicit ;-)

But reading that page right now, the first item seems described as a
possible configuration maintainability problem; the second item seems
the same -- basically "don't repeat what you don't need to repeat";
the third item is described as processor-inefficient; the fourth item
doesn't say why but just says "use try_files".

Is any specific one unclear to you?

	f
-- 
Francis Daly        francis at daoine.org