Can NGinx replace Varnish

[Stefan Caunter]

Sorry but what does this have to do with your choice of caching
solution? I've used nginx for 8 years, and varnish for 4 years.
Solution does not matter. Implementation is everything.

If the reverse proxy is not told to stick to a back end based on
client ip, you will see this behaviour regardless of solution.

You need to sort out your varnish configuration. Replacing it with
nginx without a complete understanding of your webapp and client
sessions isn't going to do anything.

This kind of post, implying that software implementations of RFCs are
somehow the issue in misconfigurations, needs to be called out
immediately.

Both nginx and varnish implement the HTTP RFCs, and they do it very
well. Learn the interfaces to configurations, and use them. It's
ridiculous to imply that nginx or varnish is a better implementation
without objective supporting evidence that can be openly discussed.


----

Stefan Caunter
CEO, ScaleEngine Inc.
"Streaming, CDN, and Internet Logistics"
E: stef at scaleengine.com
Toronto: +1 647 459 9475
+1 800 224 0192


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:39 PM, António P. P. Almeida
<appa at perusio.net> wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2012 15h31 CET, nginx-forum at nginx.us wrote:
>
>> We are using Varnish in front of 3 load balanced web servers running
>> apache.  We had migrated from one hosting platform where we had 1
>> app server and 1 database server using Varnish (Drupal 6.x) and had
>> no issues.  Now that we are running in a load balanced environment
>> (3 load balanced apache web servers, a Varnish server, and 1
>> database server) we are seeing mulitple examples of cacheing
>> issues. (Pages not displaying correctly ...style issues, data input
>> staying cached and used on another page, etc).
>
> You can drop Varnish from the picture if something like microcaching
> suits you or you use ngx_cache_purge with the purge module. It depends
> if you have an active invalidation strategy or not. Either way Nginx
> can replace Varnish and work also as load balancer. So you'll have a
> simpler stack.
>
>> We think we can just replace the Varnish server and use a NGinx
>> server.  I don't want to necessarily remove all the apache servers,
>> but we have to get this cacheing issue corrected....
>>
>> any thoughts...?
>
> Yep. See above. For Drupal related Nginx issues there's a GDO group:
>
> http://groups.drupal.org/nginx
>
> if want to delve deeper into the issue.
>
> --- appa
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx