SSL session cache lifetime vs session ticket lifetime

Maxim Dounin mdounin at mdounin.ru
Mon Mar 31 10:57:37 UTC 2014


Hello!

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:38:53PM +0400, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:

> On Thursday 27 March 2014 20:23:15 Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:34:19PM +0400, kyprizel wrote:
> > 
> > > will be "log_alloc_failures" better?
> > 
> > I think something like "log_nomem" will be good enough.
> > Patch:
> > 
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Maxim Dounin <mdounin at mdounin.ru>
> > # Date 1395937285 -14400
> > #      Thu Mar 27 20:21:25 2014 +0400
> > # Node ID 2cc8b9fc7efbf6a98ce29f3f860782a1ebd7e6cf
> > # Parent  734f0babfc133c2dc532f2794deadcf9d90245f7
> > Core: slab log_nomem flag.
> > 
> > The flag allows to suppress "ngx_slab_alloc() failed: no memory" messages
> > from a slab allocator, e.g., if an LRU expiration is used by a consumer
> > and allocation failures aren't fatal.
> > 
> > The flag is now set in the SSL session cache code, and in the limit_req
> > module.
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/core/ngx_slab.c b/src/core/ngx_slab.c
> > --- a/src/core/ngx_slab.c
> > +++ b/src/core/ngx_slab.c
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ ngx_slab_init(ngx_slab_pool_t *pool)
> >          pool->pages->slab = pages;
> >      }
> >  
> > +    pool->log_nomem = 1;
> >      pool->log_ctx = &pool->zero;
> >      pool->zero = '\0';
> >  }
> 
> Just a quick nitpicking.
> 
> I'd suggest to put this log_nomem assignment in the last line as to follow
> order of elements in the structure definition.

IMHO, it looks silly this way, and that's why it was placed just 
before the log_ctx assignment.

Note well that the order of elements in the structure is more 
about memory efficiency, and following the order isn't something 
required.

-- 
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/



More information about the nginx mailing list