enable reuseport then only one worker is working?

[Maxim Konovalov]

On 3/1/16 5:23 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 3/1/16 8:34 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> On 01/03/16 13:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 2/28/16 11:22 PM, Валентин Бартенев wrote:
>>>> On Sunday 28 February 2016 08:52:12 meteor8488 wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just upgrade Nginx from 1.8 o 1.9 on my FreeBSD box.
>>>> [..]
>>>>> Did I miss anything in the configuration? or for a busy server,
>>>>> it's
>>>>> better
>>>>> to use accept_mutex instead of reuseport?
>>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> In FreeBSD the SO_REUSEPORT option has completely different
>>>> behavior
>>>> and shouldn't be enabled in nginx.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should the configruation option then be disabled or silently
>>> ignored in
>>> FreeBSD at this time?
>>
>> It would be difficult to selectively ignore operating systems
>> based on
>> how this function is supported. Especially if that support changes
>> over
>> time.
> 
> I don't claim to know how "difficult" that would be, but with all
> the extremely talented coders in the Nginx group, I would think that
> "difficult" would not be a barrier to "doing it right". If OS
> support changes, nginx can change. Something tells me that with a
> FreeBSD Core Team member on the Nginx payroll, if this OS feature
> changes, it'll filter through to the people who write the code.
> 
Jim, we don't have any FreeBSD core team members on payroll.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov