enable reuseport then only one worker is working?

[Maxim Konovalov]

On 3/1/16 8:19 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Maxim Konovalov <maxim at nginx.com
> <mailto:maxim at nginx.com>> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/1/16 5:23 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 3/1/16 8:34 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/03/16 13:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/28/16 11:22 PM, Валентин Бартенев wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday 28 February 2016 08:52:12 meteor8488 wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just upgrade Nginx from 1.8 o 1.9 on my FreeBSD box.
>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>> Did I miss anything in the configuration? or for a busy server,
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>> to use accept_mutex instead of reuseport?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In FreeBSD the SO_REUSEPORT option has completely different
>>>>>> behavior
>>>>>> and shouldn't be enabled in nginx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should the configruation option then be disabled or silently
>>>>> ignored in
>>>>> FreeBSD at this time?
>>>>
>>>> It would be difficult to selectively ignore operating systems
>>>> based on
>>>> how this function is supported. Especially if that support changes
>>>> over
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> I don't claim to know how "difficult" that would be, but with all
>>> the extremely talented coders in the Nginx group, I would think that
>>> "difficult" would not be a barrier to "doing it right". If OS
>>> support changes, nginx can change. Something tells me that with a
>>> FreeBSD Core Team member on the Nginx payroll, if this OS feature
>>> changes, it'll filter through to the people who write the code.
>>>
>> Jim, we don't have any FreeBSD core team members on payroll.
> 
> Perhaps you can understand my confusion when I see multiple
> references to it online, including this
> tweet. https://mobile.twitter.com/maximkonovalov/status/486847353484480512. 
> 
> That, and the recent work sponsored by Nginx on FreeBSD sendfile(2)
> to be included in the upcoming release (11). If he is no longer on
> the payroll he is still working closely with you, so this hardly
> invalidates my premise that you would be aware of future changes in
> FreeBSD behavior.  ;)
> 
Jim, that was 1.6+ years ago, this is not true anymore.

Can we return to the technical part of the discussion?

-- 
Maxim Konovalov