Problem with uWSGI and PATH_INFO

[Roberto De Ioris]

> Hi all,
>
> Le 2017-07-27 à 11:25, Francis Daly a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand the logic of this. Can someone please
>>> explain why the variable PATH_INFO is set to $document_uri in
>>> uwsgi_params?
>> My guess (without knowing the history):
>>
>> The uwsgi_params values are an example of what can be done. The
>> combination of SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO in that file is consistent, and
>> is valid in some cases (that is, cases where the application corresponds
>> to the "root" of the server).
> Actually my problem is that SCRIPT_NAME is not defined in uwsgi_params.
> SCRIPT_NAME is a mandatory environment variable as per HTTP/1.1 spec.
>>
>> No-one has reported that there is a problem and provided a fix.
> That's a major issue. A standard WSGI application should be able to use
> a uWSGI upstream server within the "/" location block without the need
> to define any "mountpoints".
>

Then just add

uwsgi_param SCRIPT_NAME "";

in uwsgi_params :)


-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.com