Performance of h2 is better than h2c

[Peter Booth]

Is your client running n a different host than your server?

> On 8 Jun 2018, at 5:35 AM, prabhat <nginx-forum at forum.nginx.org> wrote:
> 
> I am taking performance data on nginx.
> The client I used is h2load
> 
> Request per second using h2 is much higher than h2c. But I think it should
> not be as h2 is having the overhead of ssl.
> I have used the command 
> ./h2load https://xx.xx.xx.xx:4070 -n500000 -c1000 -t50   --- h2
> ./h2load http://xx.xx.xx.xx:4090 -n500000 -c1000 -t50   --- h2c
> 
> and at the server side config is 
> http2_max_concurrent_streams 600000;-
> http2_max_requests 600000;
> http2_streams_index_size 524288;
> 
> The h2c is getting 23008.09 req/sec and h2 96091.85 req/sec
> 
> The request is for default page provided with nginx instalation
> 
> Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280098,280098#msg-280098
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx at nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx