LiteSpeed 5.4 vs Nginx 1.16 benchmarks

[Lucas Rolff]

> Misconfigure Nginx

Which parts are misconfigured? If I run the tests and tweak it to use CloudFlares suggested SSL settings for example then it still doesn’t really change anything. And I’d assume CloudFlare want good SSL performance. So I’m curious what settings would be configured wrong, at least they accept PR’s to correct the config in case it’s wrong.

> and use an obsolete distro version of Nginx? 😁

It uses nginx stable repository, which isn’t exactly obsolete.

- Lucas



Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: nginx <nginx-bounces at nginx.org> on behalf of Mark Mielke <mark.mielke at gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 6:27:30 PM
To: nginx at nginx.org <nginx at nginx.org>
Subject: Re: LiteSpeed 5.4 vs Nginx 1.16 benchmarks

Any idea how they did what? Misconfigure Nginx and use an obsolete distro version of Nginx? 😁


On Sat., Aug. 17, 2019, 1:17 p.m. Christos Chatzaras, <chris at cretaforce.gr<mailto:chris at cretaforce.gr>> wrote:
Today I read this post:

http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1775139

In their changelog ( https://www.litespeedtech.com/products/litespeed-web-server/release-log ) I see that they did changes related to HTTP/2.

Any idea how they did it?
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx at nginx.org<mailto:nginx at nginx.org>
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/attachments/20190818/c4a99ea3/attachment.html>